Skip to main content

Threat Intelligence

AREA

Agile Risk Enumeration Algorithm

Deterministic ranking. AI that explains it.

AREA scores, tiers and schedules your vulnerability findings from exploitation evidence, not severity alone. The math decides the order. A local model writes the why.

A CVSS score describes a vulnerability in isolation. It cannot tell you whether anyone is using it, who, or against whom. AREA can, and it shows its work.

Deterministic

Same inputs, same order, every run. No model in the loop where the ranking is decided.

Auditable

Every score traces back to the evidence that produced it, and every run leaves a log.

Repeatable

Consistent results across environments and across time, so a change in the list means a change in the world.

AI explains

A local model reads the finished ranking and writes the narrative. It never moves a finding.

The pipeline

From raw threat intelligence to a sprint ready plan

Seven stages. The first six are deterministic code. Only the last one involves a language model, and by then every decision has already been made.

Deterministic core Narrative layer

STAGE 01

ENRICH

Enrich Security Context

Security findings are enhanced with relevant threat and security intelligence to provide a broader understanding of organizational exposure and potential impact.

Contextualized Findings

STAGE 02

UNDERSTAND

Understand Risk Context

Machine learning transforms complex security signals into meaningful risk intelligence, providing a clearer understanding of risk across the vulnerability landscape.

Risk Intelligence

STAGE 03

ANALYZE

Analyze Risk Patterns

Advanced analytics surface meaningful patterns and relationships, helping distinguish significant risk from routine security noise.

Risk Insights

STAGE 04

ORGANIZE

Organize Threat Profiles

Related risks are organized into actionable threat profiles, revealing concentrations of exposure and common remediation needs.

Threat Profiles

STAGE 05

PRIORITIZE

Prioritize What Matters

Machine learning driven intelligence focuses attention and resources on the vulnerabilities and exposures that present the greatest organizational risk.

Prioritized Action Plan

STAGE 06

INFORM

Inform Decisions

Risk drivers, threat context and affected technologies are synthesized into concise, decision ready intelligence for executives and security teams.

Decision Intelligence

STAGE 07

ACT

AI Assisted Remediation Guidance

AI assisted guidance translates prioritized risk intelligence into actionable recommendations. Teams see where to act first, why it matters, and the recommended course of action.

AI Assisted Remediation Guidance

AI assisted

Tiers by percentile, sprints by wave

Tiers are cut by percentile of the composite score, so the top of the list is always the top of the list regardless of how many findings you have. Urgent and Elevated findings are then planned into sprint waves ordered by score and cluster, so the next wave of work is always defined.

Urgent
Top 10%
Elevated
Next 15%
Backlog
Remaining 75%

Service waves

Wave 1

First

Urgent plus the first Elevated batch

Wave 2

Next

Urgent plus the next Elevated batch

Wave n

Until the tiers are worked through

Backlog waits, and is still ranked

What goes in

  • Your findings

    Open vulnerabilities from the scanners you already run, scoped per system

  • ATIP enrichment

    Actors, malware, ransomware, exploits, industries and ATT&CK for each CVE

  • Exploit probability (EPSS)

    EPSS is the Exploit Prediction Scoring System, a public daily estimate of how likely a CVE is to be exploited in the next 30 days. Joined per CVE from the daily snapshot.

What comes out

  • Priority table

    Tier, rank, sprint, score and threat profile for every finding

  • Threat profile sheets

    The evidence behind each threat profile, one sheet per profile

  • Remediation guidance

    Executive and technical briefing, written by the model from the table

  • Data quality report

    Every inconsistency the cross check found, for transparency and audit

  • Run log

    Timestamps and counts, end to end, for every run

Inside AlloyGRC the result appears as the AREA Risk Level on every finding, and it is what the Vulnerabilities page and the Sprint Dashboard are ordered by.

Why it matters

The same findings, two orders

Without AREA

Severity first

A critical rated finding on a disconnected lab server sits above a high rated one that a ransomware crew is actively exploiting, because a severity score cannot see the difference.

With AREA

Exploitation first

The exploited finding moves to the top and the untouched one waits. Nothing about the underlying vulnerability data changes. What changes is whether the order reflects evidence.

See your findings in the order the evidence puts them.

Ask for a demo and watch a synthetic scan go through the pipeline: ranked, tiered, planned into sprints and explained.